Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
Why?
Fire this dude
Fire this dude
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
Maybe he was happy with HCMJ and wants to give him a second season.
-
- Posts: 30798
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
- Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
Why? Because we have a coach.
Babcock is overvalued
Babcock is overvalued
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
You don't fire your coach simply to hire one who comes available, and you sure as hell don't interview a coach while one is under contract. If they feel Johnston is not the right coach moving forward, fine. Fire him. If they feel he did a good job with the cards he was dealt last season, fine. Keep him. There's no middle ground and there shouldn't be.
It seems pretty clear to me: they liked what they saw of Johnston's system and coaching skills when the team wasn't decimated by injuries. He is and should be going nowhere this summer.
It seems pretty clear to me: they liked what they saw of Johnston's system and coaching skills when the team wasn't decimated by injuries. He is and should be going nowhere this summer.
-
- Posts: 7748
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:57 pm
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
Although people said the same thing about Bylsma's system. It's good if the Pens are healthy.
-
- Posts: 35323
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:50 am
- Location: "Order is the only possibility of rest." -- Wendell Berry
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I agree with GMJR
-
- Posts: 19587
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:02 pm
- Location: Monroeville, PA
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I agree with GMJR
-
- Posts: 5555
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:54 pm
- Location: :scared:
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I agree with GMJR
-
- Posts: 12640
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:45 pm
- Location: Phil Kessel's name is on the Stanley Cup. Thrice.
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
ZacklyWhy? Because we have a coach.
Babcock is overvalued
Other than the lmao nature of Bylsma's teams' playoff losses, you could argue that since the Wings' last cup Babcock's teams were actually less successful than the Pens.
I don't claim to be any great hockey mind but I don't really get why he and Ken Holland are so highly thought of.
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I just assumed that this was the case since they said Johnston was staying.
/non-news
/non-news
-
- Posts: 28262
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:12 pm
- Location: Methuselah Honeysuckle
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I look forward to Babcock going somewhere and not being the savior everyone expects him to be.
-
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:33 pm
- Location: Don't switch the blade on the guy in shades
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
For some reason I think they will get him
-
- Posts: 42966
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
- Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
- Contact:
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
Yup.You don't fire your coach simply to hire one who comes available, and you sure as hell don't interview a coach while one is under contract. If they feel Johnston is not the right coach moving forward, fine. Fire him. If they feel he did a good job with the cards he was dealt last season, fine. Keep him. There's no middle ground and there shouldn't be.
It seems pretty clear to me: they liked what they saw of Johnston's system and coaching skills when the team wasn't decimated by injuries. He is and should be going nowhere this summer.
-
- Posts: 3658
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:42 pm
- Location: Looking into the Italian citizenship option...
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I look forward to Babcock going somewhere and not being the savior everyone expects him to be.
-
- Posts: 3658
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:42 pm
- Location: Looking into the Italian citizenship option...
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
My money is on Toronto. And it will be an epic disaster because, well, Toronto...For some reason I think they will get him
-
- Posts: 42966
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
- Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
- Contact:
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
Yeah, Toronto has always made the most sense...MLSE money, your family doesn't have to move from Michigan for you to work in Toronto...and a chance at personnel decisions if he so chooses to want a piece of that action...and it's likely the most prestigious job out there, toughest too because the Leafs are probably the only team with multiple national networks at their practices...
-
- Posts: 18348
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:35 pm
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
He should go to buffalo
-
- Posts: 18138
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 3:00 pm
- Location: NTP66 lied about watching the game.
- Contact:
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I agree with GMJR
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
He should probably just stay in Detroit.
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I'm betting Philthy...
-
- Posts: 42966
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
- Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
- Contact:
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I really don't think there's a lot of appeal for him in Philadelphia...I'd think they'd be more likely to go after McLellan or Julien (if/when he is canned)...
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
Julien in Philly would help me condense dislike in 2 entities into one.
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
I wouldn't be surprised if he negotiated his way into being a coach and GM.
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
He has gone on record saying he doesn't want to be a GM.I wouldn't be surprised if he negotiated his way into being a coach and GM.
Rutherford "we won't be pursuing Babcock".
Good to know, I think he ends up in Buffalo.He has gone on record saying he doesn't want to be a GM.I wouldn't be surprised if he negotiated his way into being a coach and GM.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests