Yeah I'm gonna call it the same thing...One that eliminated of quarter (2 million) of their population.What sort of vetting did the Cambodian refugees face to ensure they weren't Khmer Rouge?
Wait what? The Khmer Rouge was a political ruling party.
One that eliminated of quarter (2 million) of their population.What sort of vetting did the Cambodian refugees face to ensure they weren't Khmer Rouge?
Wait what? The Khmer Rouge was a political ruling party.
I didn't say "Well screw it, just let them in to reign fire upon us."Yeah, that's what I said.So we just knowingly let 100s and or thousands of terrorists and terrorist sympathizers into countries because it is hard to fix or do? Is that how countries are supposed to run?
Not fixing it bc it is hard and expensive is knowingly doing that. What else would it be?
I didn't say "Well screw it, just let them in to reign fire upon us." Your reading comprehension skills are pretty poor for someone with a family with a background in education.Yeah, that's what I said.So we just knowingly let 100s and or thousands of terrorists and terrorist sympathizers into countries because it is hard to fix or do? Is that how countries are supposed to run?
Not fixing it bc it is hard and expensive is knowingly doing that. What else would it be?
I said in my first post that I don't think there's a right choice. It's a very hard decision either way and I don't pretend to know the answer. It basically boils down to whether we feel "our" lives are more important than "theirs". I can see both sides.
You quoted me and your response was directly referencing the section of my post you quoted. It was pretty clear you were referring to my statements, not some mysterious third party.I didn't once say you. I was just posing questions. Your reading comprehension needs improvement.
You quoted me. It was pretty clear you were referring to my statements, not some mysterious third party.I didn't once say you. I was just posing questions. Your reading comprehension needs improvement.
http://zippy.gfycat.com/UnhappyElementa ... ottle.webmThere is a thing called quoting and using it to pose questions or further dialogue without calling out a person the person you quoted or insinuating that they don't care about something... Simmer down.
People pretend the only scenerio is an already established terrorists saying, I'm goin over there with these refugees cause in 2 years I want to do some terrorism." What about people who just sympathize with radical islam, or ISIS? These people in San Bernardino were perfectly nice normal people and as Obama put it, "went down the path of radicalization." Same with the Tsarnaev's. What happens when people come here with no money, can't speak the language, can't get jobs, becoming more and more alienated from society and then, at the very least, turn to crime and violent crime? At worst "become radicalized." Just to see people shout xenophobic! islamophobic! Trumpian! and whatever else acting like this is something that would only play out in Hollywood, when it already happened, and is happening in other parts of the world as we speak, is infuriating.
How is this, uh, supposed to be a point?The, uh, murders..... they were committed in Iraq.ah, the classic "let's link a page that doesn't exist"huh-whhhaaaaa??
Finland Charges Two 'Refugees' With Terror Murder Of 11 dailycaller.com/2015/12/11/fin
I agree with you on the principle of the thing. However, if we're going to have this government idea, it seems to me that it's first order of business should be to protect those people over whom it claims authority. Now, that is just a laugh-out-loud farce, when you understand what government (the state) is... but ostensibly, it's "supposed" to provide for the security of those (unlucky) individuals within its territorial claims.
I didn't say "Well screw it, just let them in to reign fire upon us."
I said in my first post that I don't think there's a right choice. It's a very hard decision either way and I don't pretend to know the answer. It basically boils down to whether we feel our lives are more important than theirs. I can see both sides.
People said th party was dead in 2010. That didn't happen. It most likely won't now either.We're hopefully going to see the end of the modern (as it were) Republican Party in 2016. If so, how do things split out? The Trumpanistas form the MAGA Party and never look back? Or do they take over the GOP?
“There are thousands of young Yezidi women, girls, and even children, who as I speak have been enslaved and forced into sexual slavery. These girls are subjected to daily, multiple rapes by ISIS monsters,” he testified.
“According to many escaped women and girls whom I talked to in Northern Iraq, the abducted Yezidis, mostly women and children, number over 7,000. Some of those women and girls have had to watch 7-, 8-, and 9-year-old children bleed to death before their eyes, after being raped by ISIS militia multiple times a day,” said Ismail.
“I met mothers, whose children were torn from them by ISIS. These same mothers came to plead for the return of their children, only to be informed, that they, the mothers, had been fed the flesh of their own children by ISIS. Children murdered, then fed to their own mothers.
“ISIS militia have burned many Yezidi girls alive for refusing to convert and marry ISIS men. Young Yezidi boys are being trained to be jihadists and suicide bombers. All of our temples in the ISIS controlled area are exploded and destroyed.
The Republican party controls the U.S. Senate, House of Representatives, and a majority of the governor's mansions. Control of the state legislatures means they have control of districting, making it difficult for Democrats to win back Congressional seats. The one thing they haven't been able to get is the White House.People said th party was dead in 2010. That didn't happen. It most likely won't now either.We're hopefully going to see the end of the modern (as it were) Republican Party in 2016. If so, how do things split out? The Trumpanistas form the MAGA Party and never look back? Or do they take over the GOP?
Sikhs have a tradition of being a very peaceful religion, but at the same time they have a history of being fierce fighters.Retired Generals Ask Carter to Open Military to Sikhs
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2015 ... ayinmil.sm
I don't believe any politicians, on either side, truly care about the good of the people. I think politicians are power hungry egomaniacs who get into the "profession" for the perks and bribes. I'm sure there might be a handful of honest, good pols but I think they're very, very few and far between.Does anyone actually believe Democratic politicians are doing this out of compassion? I think it's patently obvious they are pushing amnesty, etc, to reinforce their voting bloc. It's very practical and pragmatic. I don't think for a second they give a flying **** about these people, but they 100% represent future votes.
I don't believe any politicians, on either side, truly care about the good of the people. I think politicians are power hungry egomaniacs who get into the "profession" for the perks and bribes. I'm sure there might be a handful of honest, good pols but I think they're very, very few and far between.Does anyone actually believe Democratic politicians are doing this out of compassion? I think it's patently obvious they are pushing amnesty, etc, to reinforce their voting bloc. It's very practical and pragmatic. I don't think for a second they give a flying **** about these people, but they 100% represent future votes.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 118 guests
