Politics And Current Events

[ExPatriatePen]

Colorado About to Require All Police Officers to Undergo Psychological Evaluations
http://truthvoice.com/2015/12/colorado- ... aluations/

And when they find the ones with issues, the unions will fight them tooth and nail.

[columbia]

Poll: Most Americans say send ground troops to fight ISIS
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/06/politics/isis-obama-poll/

Not polled on how many, of course.

[count2infinity]

Ugh... that's disappointing to hear.

[AuthorTony]

In a debate on foreign policy, I find it hard to imagine Paul not crushing each and every one of them. I didn't watch it or see any clips yet, but knowing his foreign policy, it's tough to argue against him.

I would disagree with that. I'm pretty sure that supporting military spending and intervention would be what people were looking for last night.

I was horrified to see how many people in my FB feed thought Christie had a great night. This is a guy who said, without any hesitation, that he was willing to go to war against Russia. And people think that's a swell idea.

[Troy Loney]

In a debate on foreign policy, I find it hard to imagine Paul not crushing each and every one of them. I didn't watch it or see any clips yet, but knowing his foreign policy, it's tough to argue against him.

I would disagree with that. I'm pretty sure that supporting military spending and intervention would be what people were looking for last night.

What people?
#GeneralItes

The "bomb ISIS" crowd. Do you have some sort of mental filter that only allows EPP acceptable information into your brain?

[Factorial]

In a debate on foreign policy, I find it hard to imagine Paul not crushing each and every one of them. I didn't watch it or see any clips yet, but knowing his foreign policy, it's tough to argue against him.

I would disagree with that. I'm pretty sure that supporting military spending and intervention would be what people were looking for last night.

What people?
#GeneralItes

The "bomb ISIS" crowd. Do you have some sort of mental filter that only allows EPP acceptable information into your brain?

Like nobody, he can't believe that others feel differently on issues.

[columbia]

[ExPatriatePen]

In a debate on foreign policy, I find it hard to imagine Paul not crushing each and every one of them. I didn't watch it or see any clips yet, but knowing his foreign policy, it's tough to argue against him.

I would disagree with that. I'm pretty sure that supporting military spending and intervention would be what people were looking for last night.

What people?
#GeneralItes

The "bomb ISIS" crowd. Do you have some sort of mental filter that only allows EPP acceptable information into your brain?

Calm down boy, calm down.
Let's see "The Bomb ISIS crowd" supports military spending and intervention. Now there's something nobody would have ever thought of...

The "Bomb ISIS crowd" is bi-partisan (see also: Policies of the sitting PotUS) even so, I'm not sure how that diminishes C2I's comment that 'Pauls non interventionist view is hard to argue with'.
Whether or not there's a contingent of people who have bought into the role of the US as the biggest bully on the block, doesn't mean that they have a very well thought out justification when confronted with Pauls non interventionist position.

[Troy Loney]

lol, you're seriously going to be patronizing. You are the worst.

[ExPatriatePen]

In a debate on foreign policy, I find it hard to imagine Paul not crushing each and every one of them. I didn't watch it or see any clips yet, but knowing his foreign policy, it's tough to argue against him.

I would disagree with that. I'm pretty sure that supporting military spending and intervention would be what people were looking for last night.

What people?
#GeneralItes

The "bomb ISIS" crowd. Do you have some sort of mental filter that only allows EPP acceptable information into your brain?

Like nobody, he can't believe that others feel differently on issues.

Others like when I'm agreeing with C2I? Or others as in anytime I have views different from yours?
Talk about stubborn close minded individuals.
You should get a job with BLM. They seem to value those who enjoy disrupting disrupting meaningful dialog and debate but shouting down the speaker instead of an intelligent debate on issues.

[columbia]

You seem like a very angry person.

[Troy Loney]

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/26 ... and-losers

The problem for Paul is twofold. First, however polished his arguments on these issues, there is no evidence at all that a plurality of Republican voters agree with him. Secondly, he is likely just too far behind — he averages around 2 percent support nationally, according to RealClearPolitics — for even a positive showing to make much difference.

[ExPatriatePen]

You seem like a very angry person.

LOL... Resorting to ad hominem's in your rush to defend baby brother... Awesome
Don't speak about issues. Rather use issues to illicit opinions different than yours then use ad hominem's to troll those individuals.

Not a very good debating style, but you seem to enjoy it.

[columbia]

Yes, very angry and it's obvious to all

[Troy Loney]

#GeneralItes

What does this mean anyways?

Is it supposed to be generalities?

[ExPatriatePen]

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/26 ... and-losers

The problem for Paul is twofold. First, however polished his arguments on these issues, there is no evidence at all that a plurality of Republican voters agree with him. Secondly, he is likely just too far behind — he averages around 2 percent support nationally, according to RealClearPolitics — for even a positive showing to make much difference.

You do realize that's the point I was making right? The issue isn't the size of the (bi-partisan) interventionist block, it's as C2I stated:

In a debate on foreign policy, I find it hard to imagine Paul not crushing each and every one of them. I didn't watch it or see any clips yet, but knowing his foreign policy, it's tough to argue against him.

No where in C2I's statement does he question that there are, or the size of, the interventionists, but rather that their arguments aren't "as polished" (as the article you quoted points out) as Paul's.

[Troy Loney]

So we clearly have different ideas about how one wins a debate.

And then your response with the "what people" was off base and antagonistic. Which is in line with your lunatic message board persona.

Keep up the good work.

[columbia]

Reported

[NTP66]

I rate this thread a perfect 5/7.

[grunthy]

In a debate on foreign policy, I find it hard to imagine Paul not crushing each and every one of them. I didn't watch it or see any clips yet, but knowing his foreign policy, it's tough to argue against him.

I would disagree with that. I'm pretty sure that supporting military spending and intervention would be what people were looking for last night.

What people?
#GeneralItes

The "bomb ISIS" crowd. Do you have some sort of mental filter that only allows EPP acceptable information into your brain?

Like nobody, he can't believe that others feel differently on issues.

Ah... Trying to bait me again. Nice troll attempt.

[ExPatriatePen]

I would disagree with that. I'm pretty sure that supporting military spending and intervention would be what people were looking for last night.

What people?
#GeneralItes

The "bomb ISIS" crowd. Do you have some sort of mental filter that only allows EPP acceptable information into your brain?

Like nobody, he can't believe that others feel differently on issues.

Ah... Trying to bait me again. Nice troll attempt.

Momma P always taught those boys to stick with what they do best.

[ExPatriatePen]

I rate this thread a perfect 5/7.

Great meme reference!

[columbia]

Sometimes this place reminds me of Groundhog Day.

[PFiDC]

Don't forget your booties cause its coooooold out there today.

[tifosi77]

Trump, Cruz, Bush and Christie.... all in Los Angeles today. Yahoo.