Are you and Factorial going to slap fight for my affection?NP in the ten days leading up to yesterday evening: One post in this thread.
NP the two hours after black people get mass shooty: Three posts ITT regarding shooting.
Thanks!It's complicated, but it's a feature of our Constitution that empowers the Vice President (with the support of a majority of Cabinet secretaries) to basically stage a legal coup if they feel the president is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office". In a way, I think this would be a far worse outcome than impeachment or even resignation.What is the 25th amendment?
NP in the ten days leading up to yesterday evening: One post in this thread.
NP the two hours after black people get mass shooty: Three posts ITT regarding shooting.
Good lord, what terrible form.Yes Gaucho. "Hip-Hop related"
It was put in place basically because Woodrow Wilson was in stroke-induced coma for the last two years of his presidency. The Constitution did not put into place clear language as to what to do in that situation. Last time it was invoked was when GWB went in for colon surgery and Cheney was President for 4 hours.It's complicated, but it's a feature of our Constitution that empowers the Vice President (with the support of a majority of Cabinet secretaries) to basically stage a legal coup if they feel the president is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office". In a way, I think this would be a far worse outcome than impeachment or even resignation.What is the 25th amendment?
The study omitted employers with multiple locations. So minimum wage workers at places like Target or Walgreens, and certainly employees of fast food chains, were not captured in this data. All told, that means 40% of Seattle's minimum wage labor force was not analyzed in this research.Gee, who didn't see this coming?New research released Monday by a team of economists at the University of Washington suggests the wage hike may have come at a significant cost: The increase led to steep declines in employment for low-wage workers, and a drop in hours for those who kept their jobs. Crucially, the negative impact of lost jobs and hours more than offset the benefits of higher wages — on average, low-wage workers earned $125 per month less because of the higher wage, a small but significant decline.
“The goal of this policy was to deliver higher incomes to people who were struggling to make ends meet in the city,” said Jacob Vigdor, a University of Washington economist who was one of the study’s authors. “You’ve got to watch out because at some point you run the risk of harming the people you set out to help.”
@ all the righties in here getting all excited by a week old story about an obviously flawed, non peer-reviewed study that backs up their flawed views of the minimum wage.Are all fast food restaurants not included? Or just corporate ones?The study omitted employers with multiple locations. So minimum wage workers at places like Target or Walgreens, and certainly employees of fast food chains, were not captured in this data. All told, that means 40% of Seattle's minimum wage labor force was not analyzed in this research.Gee, who didn't see this coming?New research released Monday by a team of economists at the University of Washington suggests the wage hike may have come at a significant cost: The increase led to steep declines in employment for low-wage workers, and a drop in hours for those who kept their jobs. Crucially, the negative impact of lost jobs and hours more than offset the benefits of higher wages — on average, low-wage workers earned $125 per month less because of the higher wage, a small but significant decline.
“The goal of this policy was to deliver higher incomes to people who were struggling to make ends meet in the city,” said Jacob Vigdor, a University of Washington economist who was one of the study’s authors. “You’ve got to watch out because at some point you run the risk of harming the people you set out to help.”
Unclear, as the omission I read was just 'operating a business with multiple locations'. For example, there were a couple ramen places in LA that were family-owned. One had two locations, and another had four. I would think all the employees at those six restaurants would've been excluded in that study.Are all fast food restaurants not included? Or just corporate ones?The study omitted employers with multiple locations. So minimum wage workers at places like Target or Walgreens, and certainly employees of fast food chains, were not captured in this data. All told, that means 40% of Seattle's minimum wage labor force was not analyzed in this research.Gee, who didn't see this coming?New research released Monday by a team of economists at the University of Washington suggests the wage hike may have come at a significant cost: The increase led to steep declines in employment for low-wage workers, and a drop in hours for those who kept their jobs. Crucially, the negative impact of lost jobs and hours more than offset the benefits of higher wages — on average, low-wage workers earned $125 per month less because of the higher wage, a small but significant decline.
“The goal of this policy was to deliver higher incomes to people who were struggling to make ends meet in the city,” said Jacob Vigdor, a University of Washington economist who was one of the study’s authors. “You’ve got to watch out because at some point you run the risk of harming the people you set out to help.”
Or logic... "He had a baseball hat on"? There is no baseball hat in the world big enough to ensure that Chris Christie gets no sun when he's outside.In Trump's America you don't need to tell the truth.
Lol fat pighttps://twitter.com/mattkatz00/status/8 ... 8832396288
And when confronted with the photo, his spokesman said this:
"Yes, the governor was on the beach briefly today talking to his wife and family before heading into the office. He did not get any sun. He had a baseball hat on."
He was married to Fran Drescher for two years? The F?He seems like a shtbag
Users browsing this forum: Dickie Dunn and 81 guests
