NFL
NFL
I...can't do that.
NFL
Looks like a 20lb wall ball. Could be as heavy as 30.
NFL
Yeah. I'd be more concerned with the catching than the throwing. Though either one would put me out pretty quick.
-
- Posts: 11619
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:27 pm
NFL
My back would snap like a twig trying to throw like those guys.
-
- Posts: 11619
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:27 pm
NFL
We used 25 pounders in soccer camp in high school. We would jump over a hurdle (set to highest setting) and coach would toss us the 25 lb ball in mid flight. We had to catch it and throw it back before we landed. I couldn't even clear the hurdle.
NFL
is it football season yet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNkaqiPOqUo
I don't even like the NFL but I could watch Bell run all day
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNkaqiPOqUo
I don't even like the NFL but I could watch Bell run all day
NFL
play catch over a volleyball net with a 25 pound wall ball? probably (I'm 99% sure thats a 25 pounder)Godric, can you do what James Harrison (?) is doing or not...?!?!
James muscle cleans 80% of my best ever full clean for reps, while he is just **** around. The guy is a mutant.
NFL
https://twitter.com/darrenrovell/status ... 3962880001
Nike is filing an opposition to Gronk's trademark application.
Nike is filing an opposition to Gronk's trademark application.
NFL
Informal poll around the office of four IP attorneys (two trademark specialists), and six IP paralegals, look at this and the score was 9-1 in favor of Nike.
Here's the thing with trademark: It's not like copyright, which is exclusive to the creator for their natural life plus a certain number of years. A trademark filing requires evidence of use, and once registered the owner of the mark has to enforce their IP rights, or else they can lose the registration. Other parties can file claims saying that Nike isn't really using this as a trademark, so I should be allowed to use it on my goods.
Tl;dr - if they don't oppose Gronk's application, they could set themselves up for a situation where they might lose the Jumpman mark.
Here's the thing with trademark: It's not like copyright, which is exclusive to the creator for their natural life plus a certain number of years. A trademark filing requires evidence of use, and once registered the owner of the mark has to enforce their IP rights, or else they can lose the registration. Other parties can file claims saying that Nike isn't really using this as a trademark, so I should be allowed to use it on my goods.
Tl;dr - if they don't oppose Gronk's application, they could set themselves up for a situation where they might lose the Jumpman mark.
-
- Posts: 35323
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:50 am
- Location: "Order is the only possibility of rest." -- Wendell Berry
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 63 guests