Yep, just saw this. It was written last month. Now down to 4.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/worl ... /15122367/
Yep, just saw this. It was written last month. Now down to 4.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/worl ... /15122367/
Considering they can't remember what it was like before 1900 I don't see why the arbitrary cutoff of 1900 is used.Am I the only one that is obsessed with how many people born in the 1800s are left in this world.
Turn of the century?Considering they can't remember what it was like before 1900 I don't see why the arbitrary cutoff of 1900 is used.Am I the only one that is obsessed with how many people born in the 1800s are left in this world.
Though anyone who lived through the 20s as a teen or 20 something is really cool.
Considering the point of the discussion was the number of people still alive who were born in the 1800s, having a cutoff of 1900 is kind of an important detail.Considering they can't remember what it was like before 1900 I don't see why the arbitrary cutoff of 1900 is used.
I was responding to NAN's weird obsession with the peopleConsidering the point of the discussion was the number of people still alive who were born in the 1800s, having a cutoff of 1900 is kind of an important detail.Considering they can't remember what it was like before 1900 I don't see why the arbitrary cutoff of 1900 is used.